"Hartmut Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
000f01c2b691$45a3a1a0$0b00a8c0@fortytwo">news:000f01c2b691$45a3a1a0$0b00a8c0@fortytwo...
> Terje Sletteb� wrote:
> > [...]
> > typedef char (&yes_type)[1];
> > typedef char (&no_type)[2];
>
> Within the Boost.Spirit library we have the need to have not only
> two distinct (size-)types, but something around a dozen. Wouldn't it
> be better to provide something more general as the two (size-)type
> yes/no solution? With Boost.PP this shouldn't be any problem.
You mean like:
template <int N> struct size_type { char s[N]; };
typedef size_type<1> false_t;
typedef size_type<2> true_t;
typedef size_type<3> some_other_t;
...
Dave
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
