on Wed Oct 29 2008, "Doug Gregor" <doug.gregor-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
>> I added some debugging into the BoostCore.cmake modularization code so that >> I can try and figure out what has been and has NOT been modularized. What I >> am coming up with is 27 libraries have been modularized and there are 79 >> libraries. So that leaves 52 libraries to be modularized. Is that Correct? > > That sounds right. I suggest modularizing from the leaves, and > avoiding trying to modularize those libraries that are tangled in the > core of Boost-config, type_traits, MPL, preprocessor, etc. Doug, what's your opinion of where that should go in the long run? Should we leave it alone, or should we eventually break these things down into modularizable pieces? -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com _______________________________________________ Boost-cmake mailing list Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
