On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Michael Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 31, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Doug Gregor wrote: > >>>>> >>>>> What I am not sure of is what to do with the remaining headers in the >>>>> "boost" directory. Are those going to be the "core" of Boost or ? >>>> >>>> Yeah, that's how I would do it. >>> >>> So are talking about modularizing what is left into "libs/core" then? I >>> just >>> want to be really clear and certain before I make that move. >> >> Sorry, I was very unclear. I would like the remaining libs (mpl, >> type_traits, config, and whatever else is in that tangle) >> unmodularized for now. There *are* circular dependencies at the >> library level and they aren't trivial to untangle. It's better for the >> CMake effort to leave those in the non-modularized core and let the >> library authors sort out the dependencies later. > > > How my working directory stands now is that all the libraries are > modularized. > > The problem I know have is that according to the generated dependency graph > there is only 1 circular between date_time, algorithm and regex. > > MPL, Type_Traits and such _seem_ to be ok but I think that is probably a > false report going on what you guys are telling me.
If you enable testing, does "make check" run cleanly? On Mac OS X, it should. - Doug _______________________________________________ Boost-cmake mailing list Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
