>"Jeff Garland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On more thing I forgot. I added a couple other references on C# > > documentation which is done in XML. These may or may not be of help > > -- certainly C# isn't C++, but they use XSLT heavily to produce > > output. > > > > Article on C# documentation > > http://www.squiffler.com/squiffler/article.aspx?id=1 NDOC Project > > http://ndoc.sourceforge.net/ > > Jeff, > > Was there something in particular which looked valuable in this stuff? > I'm unlikely to wade through these docs unless I know there's a > payoff, and I expect the same goes for others...
Not sure, I had just run across this stuff previously so I put it up there for related interest. The only thing that we might want to is someone to compare the C# XML/XSLT scheme against Docbook and the C++ XML. There might be some valueable ideas. But this is purely optional... Jeff ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
