On Monday 18 November 2002 05:06 pm, David Abrahams wrote:
> Douglas Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't really expect any documentation abstract tool to deal with the
> > Function headers without serious help, and I'm fine with that. I think we
> > should concentrate on getting the "normal" cases working, where libraries
> > are actually written the same way they are supposed to be used (what a
> > concept!).
>
> I'm not sure that actually occurs, does it? I'm serious: some degree
> of "folding" always seems to occur between the published interface and
> the actual implementation.
I agree with you. However, I think that with the case of Function, the
difference between the source code (preprocessed or not) and the interface
presented is big enough that it isn't worth focusing on getting it to work.
We'd be better off with a library like Any or Array, where the code is
reasonably close to the interface and doesn't require much transformation.
Doug
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
