On Thursday 12 December 2002 01:18 pm, Peter Simons wrote:
> So my proposal to proceed would be to start evaluating element by
> element and to fill the definitions out the way you want them to be.
> At the same time, we need to decide in which context to allow them in
> the DocBook DTD.
Sounds good. Most of the context should be obvious from the context in C++
(e.g., it doesn't make sense to have template-type-parameter in a namespace,
because that doesn't happen in C++). I'm fearing what will happen when I try
xmllint on the current source :)
Doug
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
