Douglas Paul Gregor wrote: > I think we should integrate the C++XML XSLT with the DocBook XSLT > stylesheets. We need some of their tools to help us get more > out of the documentation system (e.g., generation of testcases from > tutorial text), and we may want to do DocBook customizations, both > of which are easier if we have the source in our own CVS. If there > are no objections, I'll be importing the DocBook XSL stylesheets > and moving all of our XSL stylesheets within that directory tree.
I don't have any objections - in fact, I think it's a good idea, - but I just wanted to note (I am pretty sure you know it, but just in case :) that a lot of DocBook customization can be done without actually touching any of the original files. IMO that should be a preferred way - apart from the changes that are targeting to become patch submits :). Aleksey ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
