David Abrahams <dave <at> boost-consulting.com> writes: > > Thomas Guest <thomas.guest <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > Joel, JoÃo, > > > > I think the model Joel presents, based on collectors, looks conceptually > > neater. The documentation drives the source code. > > Both kinds of processing are needed. I used both with Litre when > writing C++ Template Metaprogramming.
I defer to your experience here. Certainly I can see both being useful, and I can well believe both are necessary. > > I can see more clearly how the second model (presented by JoÃo) would > > work, but I don't like adding the snippet delimiters in comments. It > > cuts across the Doxygen comment processing. > > Doxygen should not get special reign over the domain of comments. Indeed not -- it's just that QuickBook currently hooks into Doxygen, though (even as a Doxygen user) I've never uesd this facility. [snip] Regards, Thomas ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
