"John Maddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Quickbook's syntax is modal and switches to and from plain
>> quickbook syntax to c++/python/etc. Unlike Quickbook, ReST
>> does not have highlighting and the code above will be
>> ambiguous in Quickbook in c++ source code mode.
>>
>> Perhaps what we need is a way to escape to qbk from within
>> code snippets. In qbk mode, we use the tick `some code` to
>> switch temprarily from qbk to source code mode. I think it
>> should be easy to do the same the other way around. To avoid
>> clashing with the syntax of the language, the escape mark
>> should be part of the highlighting configuration. For c++,
>> we can reuse the tick. Example:
>>
>> struct is_void : public `*true-or-false-type*` {};
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> That's actually one of the things I tried in case it worked already, so yes
> I think it is a good idea ;-)
But it doesn't capture quite the same semantics as <replaceable>.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
