Joel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What I don't seem to understand is why you are so against > alternative (and hopefully simpler) schemes when it is already > clear that there will ultimately be support for python or > some other scripting language as a fall back anyway.
Wasn't clear to me. > QB parametric macros will be implemented. It is part of the plan > since day one. Support for python will be implemented. So, why are > you still worried? I'm not. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
