David Abrahams wrote:
http://boost-consulting.com/boost/tools/quickbook/doc/html/quickbook/syntax.html
shows that underline formatting isn't working.
That's working now in the branch that Eric and I are working on.
It's a simple CSS tweak. I'll merge that into the HEAD.
BTW, when I was
reading the BoostBook and DocBook specifications, I couldn't find
direct style formatting elements such as "underline" and "italic;"
instead there were "semantic" things like "emphasis." (**) So what
BoostBook do these quickbook tags actually generate?
Like syntax coloration, they generate spans. For example,
[_underline] generates: <span class="underline">underline</span>.
The CSS then does the right thing for class underline.
(**) Personally I'm dubious about the semantic value of "emphasis"
over "italic" -- when you're at a low level like that a specific
request for formatting might be better...
Right. DocBook tries hard to separate presentation from
actual content.
> but that's really a separate
> question.
Oops, you lost me. Was that a question?
Regards,
--
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
