Eric Niebler wrote:
João Abecasis wrote:
Hi!
Rene Rivera wrote:
A rule is invoked with values in /field1/ through /fieldN/. They may
be referenced in the procedure's statements as [^$(1)] through
[^$(/N/)] (9 max), and the first two only may be referenced in the
action's /commands/ as [^$(1)] and [^$(2)]. [^$(<)] and [^$(>)] are
synonymous with [^$(1)] and [^$(2)].
I haven't looked too much into this, but it seems the /italics/
mark-up is being fooled here.
Yup. It's fixed now. Thanks for the report.
Cool, I'll try it out tomorrow... But I found another:
Having two consecutive /emphasis/ marks in a /row/.
Causes it to think of it as one longer /emphasis\/ markup \/instead/.
Although I can't remember now if it was only when /a/ single letter like
/b/ is involved.
--
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
