"David Abrahams" wrote
> [/ I don't see any point in saying this -- DWA
Yes good point. The is_convertible stuff is irrelevant. The footnote is
redundant then too --->
> implicit_cast<t>(S) will usually [link note1
> '''<superscript>1</superscript>'''] succeed if
> [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]/../../doc/html/boost_typetraits/reference.html#boost_typetraits.is_convertible
>
> boost::is_convertible<S,T>]::value is true, but will always cause a
> compile_time error if
> [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]/../../doc/html/boost_typetraits/reference.html#boost_typetraits.is_convertible
>
> boost::is_convertible<S,T>]::value is false.
[...]
> [#note1]
> Note1\n
> The following is one situation where is_convertible<foo,int> will return true
> but where implicit_cast won't succeed.
>
> struct foo{
> operator int() { throw "fooled ya"; }
> };
>
> [endsect]
Removing those two parts would tidy it up a lot.
Regards
Andy Little
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
