Joel de Guzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Joel de Guzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Seems to me that normalization could be part of the testing system,
>> rather than *forced* to be part of the qbk generation process every
>> time.
>
> Well, Eric added the bypass, so it's not forced. Arguably,
> the default could be off (bypass). If that's what more people
> want, so be it. Perhaps when we reach the next boost release
> we could make it so. It's just that, in the meantime, I am
> requesting people not to bypass it so we can test the test
> system itself.

I think normalization is probably a good default.

>> In any case, got a workaround for me?  I want to make progress on
>> those docs!
>
> I'll work on a patch tomorrow morning. For now, you can use
> Joao's workaround or siwtch off the post processor as Eric
> suggested.

Thanks.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs

Reply via email to