Eric Niebler wrote:
My grievance with BoostBook's handling of enums goes back a long way
(eg., http://tinyurl.com/fn2hj). The following problems are now fixed:
- Doc comments on enum values are no longer ignored. If you bother to
add doc comments your enumerations, they'll actually show up in your
reference documentation. Imagine that! :-) If you comment your enum
values, they will show up as a variable list in the (new!) Description
section of your enum reference. See http://tinyurl.com/oo7vm for an
example.
I get some strange persistent link underlines on the enums. But it looks
good... Mostly I like the real definitions lists ;-)
--
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
