Joel de Guzman wrote: > Paul A Bristow wrote: > >> So I am right that you are suggesting inserting >> >> [/ >> Copyright 2006 John Maddock and Paul A. Bristow. >> Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. >> (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt]) >> ] >> >> in ALL (30ish!!!) .qbk files in the Math Toolkit 'document'? > > Yeah, I know the pain, but it was not I who suggested that. IIUC, the > current boost policy is to have copyrights and license info on all > documents and source code. The Boost inspection report checks for > missing Boost license info. Am I right, Rene? Or is it limited to > just the generated HTML files?
Yes it checks all sources and docs. More accurately it checks all files it can reasonably read. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
