David Abrahams wrote: > Joel de Guzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Paul A Bristow wrote: >> >>> So I am right that you are suggesting inserting >>> >>> [/ >>> Copyright 2006 John Maddock and Paul A. Bristow. >>> Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. >>> (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt]) >>> ] >>> >>> in ALL (30ish!!!) .qbk files in the Math Toolkit 'document'? >> Yeah, I know the pain, but it was not I who suggested that. IIUC, the >> current boost policy is to have copyrights and license info on all >> documents and source code. The Boost inspection report checks for >> missing Boost license info. Am I right, Rene? Or is it limited to >> just the generated HTML files? > > it's not limited to HTML files.
Then something is wrong because most of my .qbk files do not have copyright or license information, but the inspect tool hasn't complained. -- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
