| -----Original Message----- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf | Of Daniel James | Sent: 23 September 2006 22:06 | To: Boost documentation format, structure, and processing discussion | Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] W3C validation of HTML from | Quickbook document | | Rene Rivera wrote: | > Paul A Bristow wrote: | > | >> And perhaps it could include the code for the W3C | validated logo as well? | >> I assume it should pass ;-) | >> | > | > I doubt it would pass, as it doesn't generate XHTML. It | generates HTML4. | > | | The validator can validate HTML, and some experts are | recommending using | HTML nowadays (such as http://webkit.org/blog/?p=68).
This told me more than I wanted to know ;-) | I've attached a | patch which makes it more likely that the generated files | will validate. Thanks - I'll give it a try. Paul --- Paul A Bristow Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB +44 1539561830 & SMS, Mobile +44 7714 330204 & SMS [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
