David Abrahams wrote: > Joel de Guzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Alas, not in this case. It's too fundamental. The syntax >> is intrinsic to quickbook. For example: >> >> [stuff a b c d] >> >> what are the arguments of stuff? > > I have no problem with that. > I also have no problem with > > [stuff a..b..c..d] > > I do have a problem with > > [stuff a..b c d] > > unless that's just 2 arguments. Alright, so you want it either to be the first form, or the second form, but not combined. Noted. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
