David Abrahams wrote: > This: > > [* foo [bar] > > parses as > > > and > > [* foo [bar]] > > parses as > > <bold>foo [bar</bold>] > > It seems as though misspellings can easily lead to surprises: > since bar is not a keyword or template name, the preceding open > bracket is treated as plain text. > > That worries me; I rather think [] should be matched unless escaped. > > Thoughts?
I agree. That behavior also makes it difficult to do error checking. I think now that all uses of [] should be "reserved" for quickbook (except of course, in code blocks and phrases). Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
