On 1/9/07, David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Dean Michael Berris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Would it be alright to put up on-line documentation bearing the Boost > > C++ Libraries image even if the library is not part of the Boost C++ > > Libraries yet? > > Even though I believe it's commonly done, I think we should discourage > it. >
I agree... I think though the major issues would have something to do with copyright and "expressed written consent" and possible "misrepresentation". As I understand it, the image is also licensed under the Boost License, but the trademark of "Boost C++ Library" or the "Boost Logo" is held by... someone? > > If not, what would be the best approach for putting a different image > > on the generated documentation? I'm tempted to just make an image and > > save it as boost.gif and bundle it with the documentation. Though that > > might work, I'm not sure that's the best approach. > > Sounds OK to me. If you want to put a "PROPOSED FOR" watermark across > the Boost logo, that might work. > That sounds like a good idea. :) I'll get around to trying that soon... I'll let you guys check it out if you might like to see it in some libraries too proposed for Boost. :) -- Dean Michael C. Berris http://cplusplus-soup.blogspot.com/ mikhailberis AT gmail DOT com +63 928 7291459 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
