Rene Rivera wrote: > Jeff Garland wrote: >> Just so we get all our favorite editors, here's an xemacs sample ;-) >> >> http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/boost_web/emacs_screenshot_2.png >> http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/boost_web/emacs_screenshot_1.png >> >> Note that the emacs recognizer is smart enough to distinguish variable from >> typenames. > > Yes, classic emacs, throws in the kitchen sink and makes it look like > rainbow coding ;-)
:-) > Seriously... red == error, green == good (comments). Yep, I'm not in love with the emacs default colors just posting them for perspective. One of these days I'll get around to changing them...maybe after folks on this list come up with the perfect color set ;-) I was just looking at what 'gedit' does on Linux, it's really bad -- function names and some keywords (for, return) are a bolded red. Strings and numbers are some sort of florescent pink. yuk! Jeff ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
