Matias Capeletto wrote:
On 6/8/07, Rene Rivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Jeff Garland wrote:Just so we get all our favorite editors, here's an xemacs sample ;-)http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/boost_web/emacs_screenshot_2.png http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/boost_web/emacs_screenshot_1.png Note that the emacs recognizer is smart enough to distinguish variable from typenames.Yes, classic emacs, throws in the kitchen sink and makes it look like rainbow coding ;-) Seriously... red == error, green == good (comments).
While we're on the subject of different IDE's and schemes, I'm attaching a shot of Borland's default scheme.
Ok, what color do you proposed for the strings? Do you think that others colors are fine?
I think we're running out of colors :-)I think the redish color is OK for strings, but probably because I've got used to it. Green or Blue would be safe choices, but might not stand out as much from the other stuff.
One other thing to check before we settle this: that the color scheme prints OK, and particularly that it prints OK in monochrome. If the colors are too light then you can end up with real problems trying to read printed output :-( Just thought I'd flag this up before we get too carried away.
John.
<<attachment: borland-ide.png>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
