Hi Alain,

On Jul 15, 2017, at 7:28 AM, Alain Miniussi via Boost-mpi 
<boost-mpi@lists.boost.org<mailto:boost-mpi@lists.boost.org>> wrote:

It passes with:

       - Intel compiler  17.0.2
       - library IMPI 5.0.3.048


On 15/07/2017 14:08, Alain Miniussi via Boost-mpi wrote:
https://github.com/boostorg/mpi/pull/49

I just ran graph, graph-parallel, and mpi tests with latest pull of master.  
All the tests passed provided they’re built with std=c++11.  This is on my Mac 
with OpenMPI 1.8.4 and clang, gcc and intel-17.  Is the failure you mention 
platform or toolset specific?  I’ve been gone for quite a while so thanks for 
working to get things fixed up.

Noel



On 15/07/2017 14:05, Alain Miniussi via Boost-mpi wrote:
Hi,

I just realized that people with a platform boost installed had their 1.64 
distrib building for the wrong reasons... (as long as a "correct" get_data is 
included, it can come from /usr...).

So, considering:

a) Since the 1.65 process is ongoing, huge merges should be avoided.
b) The lib needs to live on, develop should be merge quickly so that we can get 
some work done.
c) The 1.65 should build for good reason.
d) current fixes for the get_data issue are in merges against develop.

What about the following proposal:

I will manually merge the minimal subset of 
https://github.com/boostorg/mpi/pull/47 that get master passing the test even 
when no boost header are present in /usr/include.

It's in branch get_data_fix for those interested. Any issue/build report is 
welcomed.

Then, short after 1.65 is out, develop will be merged into master unless 
someone has issues with it.

People can already have a look at https://github.com/boostorg/mpi/pull/46 and 
https://github.com/boostorg/mpi/pull/48.

I'll answer to the todo list question in another mail.

Regards.


_______________________________________________
Boost-mpi mailing list
Boost-mpi@lists.boost.org<mailto:Boost-mpi@lists.boost.org>
https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-mpi

_______________________________________________
Boost-mpi mailing list
Boost-mpi@lists.boost.org<mailto:Boost-mpi@lists.boost.org>
https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-mpi

_______________________________________________
Boost-mpi mailing list
Boost-mpi@lists.boost.org<mailto:Boost-mpi@lists.boost.org>
https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-mpi

_______________________________________________
Boost-mpi mailing list
Boost-mpi@lists.boost.org
https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-mpi

Reply via email to