tl;dr Do you want to have professional recording of C++Now sessions?

 

 

Boost Steering Committee, C++Now Planning Committee, Marshall (Recording 
Chair), Bryce (S/V Chair),

 

Some background:

 

Conference Chair Spending Authority

During the face-to-face Steering Committee meeting at C++Now in 2012, I asked 
the Steering Committee for guidelines about what kinds of conference related 
expenses I, as C++Now Conference Chair, needed to get Steering Committee 
approval for.

 

The answer was that the Steering Committee gave me authorization to approve 
expenses for the conference with two conditions:

1.       The conference would still be projected to run in the black

2.       There was no obligation of an on-going expense (continuing into future 
years) 

 

In my opinion, this has served us well as I can make conference related 
decisions quickly and we’ve come to learn that getting SC approval in a timely 
manner is a non-trivial issue.

 

Note that the S/V program originally fell under these conditions because it 
originally didn’t include us paying expenses for the S/Vs. We do cover most of 
those expenses now, but that was separately approved by the Steering Committee.

 

Conference Sponsorships

I’ve unilaterally followed the guideline that when developing the spending plan 
for the conference, I’ve not included sponsorship money. The practice has 
always been that the attendees, not sponsors, pay for the conference and that 
all sponsorship money goes directly to the Boost treasury. This works for two 
reasons:

1.       I don’t have to worry about whether we have sponsorship money before, 
for example, planning the picnic.

2.       This allows Boost to accumulate funds to do things which the community 
wants to fund (such as S/V expenses, BSoC, purchase of testing hardware).

 

This has also worked well. Even though our Sponsorship situation has varied 
from year to year, the conference has run smoothly and Boost has accumulated 
funds.

 

Professional Recording

This year I want to do something that might change this pattern. We have a 
quote from Bash Films, the company that does the recording, editing, and 
uploading of session videos for CppCon. For $18,500 Bash will record, edit, and 
upload all three C++Now tracks (60-65 videos).

 

In anticipation of recording a single track, we have raised the registration 
fee for C++Now 2017 by $100. This will increase the pre-Sponsorship revenue of 
the conference by about $10K which I had expected to apply to paying Bash to 
record a single track.

 

Bash’s quotes for a single track and for all three tracks this year are 
significantly less expensive than their quote from a few years ago. (Part of 
the reason for this is that they have become more cost effective and part of it 
is that they have an event in Denver that is time-adjacent to C++Now and they 
can save on travel.) This means that recording a track can be covered by the 
registration rate increase alone and recording all three tracks is within our 
means.

 

Aspen Institute Permission

One issue with recording all three tracks is that in the past, the Aspen 
Institute has let us know that they would permit us to record our sessions in 
Peapcke and Hudson, only if we were doing it ourselves, but if we were to have 
professionals do this, they would expect us to use their techs. At the rates 
that the Institute charges for AV services, this would be prohibitively 
expensive. After receiving Bash’s quote on doing all three tracks, I’ve pressed 
the Institute on this and they have given permission to allow us to use Bash 
Films for our sessions at their venue.

 

Advantages

I want to thank Marshall and the S/Vs of each year for all their work in 
recording, editing, and uploading. My gratitude is sincere and is not 
diminished by the fact that I think having Bash do this work for us would have 
several advantages.

·         The quality of the recording would be better

o    The venue, particularly Flug, is a challenging one to record at and 
professionals will be better able to deal with these issues.

·         The editing will be much better

o    If you’ve not seen what Bash does with the CppCon videos, you really need 
to check that out. They picture-in-picture the speaker in a tiny window to make 
the slides large and legible. For the slides, they capture the direct video 
output and do not reply on pointing a camera at the screen. Here is an example:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGu9XWsOgWQ

·         The upload time will be very much better

o    We’ll be able to have the videos in our YouTube channel within weeks 
(perhaps one or two) of the conference instead of months.

·         It frees up time for Marshall and the S/V to spend less time worrying 
about and tracking cameras and memory drives and more time participating in the 
conference.

 

There is also an important advantage to having all of the tracks done by Bash, 
so that we don’t have to deal with speakers that push very strongly to be in 
Flug just because they’ll have a better recording and we don’t have to explain 
to the community why some videos are up right away and some are going to be 
delayed.

 

Future Years

Having Bash record sessions this year does not obligate us to do the same in 
future years (although it will set a quality bar that we’ll not want to fall 
below).

 

This year is a very good year for this for two reasons. One is that, due to a 
Bash event in Denver, we are getting a better quote than we are likely to get 
in future years. Another reason is that we are having a very good sponsorship 
year this year. (It looks like we’ll be over $13K in sponsorships for C++Now 
2017.) I am optimistic that we can do well in future years, but, of course, 
there are no guarantees.

 

Summary

Although having Bash record all three sessions is technically something I can 
authorize myself (the conference will still be in the black and there is no 
future obligation), I wanted to consult with the Steering Committee about this 
because it is a very large expense and it does set a precedence, if not an 
obligation, for future conferences.

 

I also want to get thoughts from the planning committee. For this kind of 
money, we could probably have steaks and Champaign at the picnic. Is this a 
good use of conference money?

 

Mark Bashian, the owner of Bash Films is current travelling and will be 
contacting me when he returns in a couple of weeks. Currently, my plan is to 
tell him that we want all three tracks recorded, but I’ll reconsider that there 
are strong negative comments.

 

Please share your thoughts.

 

Jon

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Boost Steering Committee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to