On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Stewart, Robert <[email protected]> wrote: > I can think of only one argument against professional videos: it will > encourage more people to attend via video rather than in person. So long as > we continue to sell out and can charge enough to cover the expenses, that > argument is moot.
It is worth noting that we didn't have as much of a registration rush last year as we've typically had. If that trend continues, we'd have to reassess. I'm hopeful that we'll sell out this year. > Of course now we have less to justify the S/V role! Yep, this will significantly change the S/V workload. We will still need an S/V in every session to make sure the speaker is aware of how much time they have left and remind speakers to repeat questions, just like at CppCon. This will help ensure that other S/V tasks, like helping Patty with the breaks, go smoother. It'll also mean the S/Vs have more availability to run between rooms to report problems, help speakers get their laptops connected, etc. -- Bryce Adelstein Lelbach aka wash Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory ISO C++ Committee Member CppCon and C++Now Program Chair -- Nocturnal Language Lawyer -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Boost Steering Committee" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
