It's a very very big exchange. I don't think I can persuade it to change(?). Now let's focus on 64-bit UUID. Can do by boost? As I mentioned before, let me hold responsible for mis-usage. you experience people just help.
________________________________ From: Boost-users <boost-users-boun...@lists.boost.org> on behalf of Gavin Lambert via Boost-users <boost-users@lists.boost.org> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 3:07 AM To: boost-users@lists.boost.org <boost-users@lists.boost.org> Cc: Gavin Lambert <bo...@mirality.co.nz> Subject: Re: [Boost-users] UUID On 29/07/2021 9:16 am, chengm349 wrote: > so boost uuid can't support compromised uuid needs? Don't make something look like a uuid if it's not actually a uuid. That road leads to pain and torment. Go back to the customer and clarify the requirement, it's likely they can be persuaded to do things better. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
