On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 07:27, Ming Cheng via Boost-users < boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Now let's focus on 64-bit UUID. > There is no such thing. Can do by boost? > Therefore no. As I mentioned before, let me hold responsible for mis-usage. you > experience people just help. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Boost-users <boost-users-boun...@lists.boost.org> on behalf of > Gavin Lambert via Boost-users <boost-users@lists.boost.org> > *Sent:* Thursday, July 29, 2021 3:07 AM > *To:* boost-users@lists.boost.org <boost-users@lists.boost.org> > *Cc:* Gavin Lambert <bo...@mirality.co.nz> > *Subject:* Re: [Boost-users] UUID > > On 29/07/2021 9:16 am, chengm349 wrote: > > so boost uuid can't support compromised uuid needs? > > Don't make something look like a uuid if it's not actually a uuid. That > road leads to pain and torment. > > Go back to the customer and clarify the requirement, it's likely they > can be persuaded to do things better. > _______________________________________________ > Boost-users mailing list > Boost-users@lists.boost.org > https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users > _______________________________________________ > Boost-users mailing list > Boost-users@lists.boost.org > https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users > -- Richard Hodges hodge...@gmail.com office: +44 2032 898 513 home: +376 861 195 mobile: +376 380 212
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
