I don't understand property_maps. I think the documentation is written in a sort of metaprogramming language which precludes its use by most programmers, in a way that is different from the language in which one usually understands the STL or most of the other Boost libraries as an end user.
I would like to urge boost implementors to write their documentation first in a language that is for end users to understand and only then have advanced sections for other implementors to use. As an example of what I think is excellent Boost documentation, I will point to Jaako Jarvi's tuple and lambda docs. I am sure Mr. Siek is brilliant and knowledgable but his docs on property_map leave me gasping for air. Perhaps the fault is mine. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
