[For those who is unaware of the subject, Paul is referring to section 14.8.2 of the standard, and, in particular, to this discussion - http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=003401c1d1f3%24e61ddf20%247772e50c%40c1 61550a]
Paul Mensonides wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Would it be enough for you to implement the 'is_callable' trait with the > > desired behavior? > > If they cleaned up that type deduction success/error?/failure garbage, we > could have it that way too. Yes, I also happened to think that would be a preferred way to get equivalent of the hypothetical '__is_well_formed(...)' functionality. However, assuming that we got that one or another way, my concern is that this alone would not be enough to implement the 'is_callable' trait we want. (But then I am not sure what exactly we want :). Aleksey _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
