Paul Mensonides wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > You can already detect whether it has operator() (or any other member > > > function for that matter). Is that what you want? > > > > Hmm, Doug is better qualified to answer this question, but suppose that > > detecting the presence of any number of 'operator()'-s is good enough. > Would > > you be able to implement that given the tweaked 14.8.2? > > What do you mean by "tweaked"?
With the cleaned up "type deduction success/error?/failure garbage" :) Aleksey _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
