>That was me, although I have no CVS write access and Dave applied the >patch. Anyway, I will prepare a patch for >http://www.boost.org/libs/config/config.htm#user_settable when I have >some time. Anything else that needs to be done?
I don't think so, I'll apply the test program and some minimal docs when I get a chance, I still worry that the test may only work for some compiler settings, and that would really mess up the config regression tests, but I guess we'll see :-) > Is it possible to test for this? If so can a test program be supplied > please - the test program should compile and run only if the feature is > available - see one of the boost_has_XXX.cxx files for examples. >AFAICS, Terje's program is correctly detecting it. I agree to the rest >of the discussion that this should be stable and independent of compiler >flags. The "broken" NRVO of the Intel compiler is not a problem for >operators.hpp, as it returns 'T' instead of 'const T', so the test >matches the current use of the NRVO. Thanks Terje. OK good. Thanks, John Maddock http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
