On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 10:36:57 +0100, Daniel Frey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I agree to the rest
>of the discussion that this should be stable and independent of compiler
>flags.
But are you speaking in general or for the sake of the test? :-)
Because in the latter case it's quite obvious. In the former, this is
a better argument to disagree with my disagreement: suppose the
function f() is in a pre-compiled library. Now, go down to the
implementation level and think of the possible calling conventions
class A {};
A f();
A a = f();
That begins to be off-topic though (and beyond the scope of the
standard), so I will not go on.
Genny.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
