> If you need an apriori guarentee that this is extensible to XML > in order to vote for the library then your decision is easy. I don't
I wasn't asking for this, I was asking for clarification. From the tone of your previous mail it seemed like you had some insight about the details of the design that made using XML a problem. From your latest response it seems to be a lack of knowledge about XML... > believe anyone can give such a guarentee for this case. Of course, > if someone does manage to do this - great. But until someone > does, you should vote against it. No. Again, based on my review of the design, I don't see an issue with using XML. It would really just be adding a different flavor of text archive -- just much more complex. Jeff _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost