> If you need an apriori guarentee that this is extensible to XML
> in order to vote for the library then your decision is easy.  I don't

I wasn't asking for this, I was asking for clarification.  From the 
tone of your previous mail it seemed like you had some insight about
the details of the design that made using XML a problem.  From your
latest response it seems to be a lack of knowledge about XML...

> believe anyone can give such a guarentee for this case.  Of course,
> if someone does manage to do this - great.  But until someone
> does, you should vote against it.

No.  Again, based on my review of the design, I don't see an
issue with using XML.  It would really just be adding a
different flavor of text archive -- just much more complex.

Jeff
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to