From: "Jeff Garland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Anyway, my conclusion is there is nothing preventing using
> serialization for XML other than the time and energy to do
> it.
As I already said, my experience is that this theory sometimes proves wrong.
I certainly know that I had to redesign my serialization system when I added
XML support (a fixed XML format, defined by me [*], not arbitrary schema
support.)
As I already said, binary/sequence formats only need to prepend a header to
the data being serialized, whereas XML and other hierarchical/structured
formats need to append a trailer (or do other processing), too. If the
serialization system hasn't been designed with this in mind, it is possible
that a structured format serializer cannot be written under its framework.
It is also entirely possible that the framework handles structured formats
with ease. The only way to know is to see a proof of concept.
--
[*] Example:
std::vector< std::pair<std::string, int> > v;
produces either
<q size="2">
<r>
<f>test</f>
<f>1</f>
</r>
<r>
<f>test2</f>
<f>2</f>
</r>
</q>
or
<q size="2" name="v">
<r name="[0]">
<f name="first">test</f>
<f name="second">1</f>
</r>
<r name="[1]">
<f name="first">test2</f>
<f name="second">2</f>
</r>
</q>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
