>From: "Terje Slettebų" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Is it any different from reinterpret_cast<T*>(p) ? > > > > It might be, depending on your compiler. The behavior of > > reinterpret_cast<T*> is implementation-defined. > > Doesn't that mean that dangerous_cast would also be implementation-defined?
Oops, never mind. I thought you meant that the behaviour of dangerous_cast would depend on the compiler, but I understand now that you meant reinterpret_cast. Terje _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
