Terje Slettebų <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | >From: "Terje Slettebų" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | > >From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > | > > Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > > | > > > Is it any different from reinterpret_cast<T*>(p) ? | > > | > > It might be, depending on your compiler. The behavior of | > > reinterpret_cast<T*> is implementation-defined. | > | > Doesn't that mean that dangerous_cast would also be | implementation-defined? | | Oops, never mind. I thought you meant that the behaviour of dangerous_cast | would depend on the compiler, but I understand now that you meant | reinterpret_cast.
But, Dave said "it might be, depending on your compiler" which means it might -not-, as well, depending on the compiler. so, you had a point :-) -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
