On 08 Dec 2002 15:09:32 +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Gennaro Prota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >[...] > >| If void* is not a "pointer to an object" then reinterpret_cast<void*> >| is invalid. Otherwise it just yields an undefined result. I should have said "unspecified", sorry. > I haven't >| found a definition of "pointer to object" in the standard; anyhow >| certainly void is not an object type. > >void* is the generic type of "pointer to object." Well, as I said I don't find any definition of the expression "pointer to object" (though, of course, I do know that you can point to an object through a void*). In any case, do you agree that at least the result is unspecified? Genny. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
