At 02:58 PM 12/9/2002, you wrote: >At 03:53 PM 12/8/2002, Gennaro Prota wrote: > >>On Sun, 08 Dec 2002 13:16:24 -0700, Greg Colvin >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>It may be time to post a question to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>Thank you very much. What is that? An internal list for the C++ >>committee? Is it open to everybody, or you meant that *you* are going >>to post a question there? > >It is the committee's Core Working Group mailing list (which for historical reasons >is called a "reflector"). > >It is almost certainly protected against any except authorized posters. That means >committee members and "technical experts" that committee members have asked to >participate.
Right. >Several committee members (Gaby, Dave Abrahams, Greg, me, etc.) will be happy to post >something on that list if the question is well-formed and is one that only committee >members can answer. But usually that only happens when Boosters have talked the issue >to death, and can't move forward without committee interpretation. And this conversation seems to have reached that point. >Boost seems to have an excellent reputation among committee members. Part of that is >because we don't bother them unneccessisarily. > >--Beman > > >_______________________________________________ >Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
