In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0212161022130.11243-100000@lynx> On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:07:45 -0800 (PST) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > [Various reflection library links]
This is interesting, but to me it mostly confirms that I don't want a reflection framework. It is at the wrong level of abstraction, in that it deals with methods and instance variables rather than fields. I also don't trust an automated versioning system to get versioning right in complex cases. (I am also concerned about the overheads of using reflection to implement the simpler kinds of serialisation.) -- Dave Harris _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
