[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Harris) writes:
> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0212161022130.11243-100000@lynx>
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:07:45 -0800 (PST) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> [Various reflection library links]
>
> This is interesting, but to me it mostly confirms that I don't want a
> reflection framework. It is at the wrong level of abstraction, in that it
> deals with methods and instance variables rather than fields.
What's a "field"? In particular, please compare/contrast with
"instance variable".
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
