David Abrahams wrote:
thought, I am not sure if it's a good choice. Does
apply< unarize<F>, list<int,long> >::type
convey the discussed meaning for you?
No, but I'm not sure that unroll_args does either.
unroll_args doesn't, in fact, unroll arguments. It's a metafunction
adapter. "Unroll" is usually used with loops, not arguments. But
that might be the best name we can come up with.
When I did this sort of thing on the runtime side, I called it
"pack/unpack." What about "unpack_args?"
-Dave
--
"Some little people have music in them, but Fats, he was all music,
and you know how big he was." -- James P. Johnson
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
