At 02:54 AM 1/4/2003, you wrote: >Hi all, > >How would you call an 'apply' counterpart that takes a metafunction class >and a _sequence_ of arguments, i.e.: > > typedef list_c<int,5,0> args; > typedef apply_tuple< plus<>, args >::type sum; // this one > BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(sum::value == 5); > >? > >If it was run-time C++, I would be happy with 'apply_tuple', but in MPL >domain "tuple" isn't really the right word, and I don't like 'apply_seq' or, >worse yet, 'apply_sequence'. Or should it be 'seq_apply' (from an English >language standpoint)?
If this construct applies a metafuntion to a sequence then "apply_to_sequence" would be an accurate name. Too bad it can't just be "apply". _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
