"Paul Mensonides" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Boost mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 12:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [boost] Re: Small thing: yes_type and no_type made public?
>
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hartmut Kaiser) writes:
>>
>> >
>> > // The following expands to
>> > //
>> > // typedef char (&sizeN_t)[N];
>> > //
>> > // for N = 1..BOOST_MAX_SIZETYPE_COUNT
>> > #define SIZETYPE(z, n, nil) \
>> > typedef char (&size ## n ## _t)[n]; \
>> > /**/
>>
>> Careful; isn't the symbol "_t" reserved to the implementation in this
> context?
>
> I thought it was only if the underscore was followed by a capital letter, as
> in "_T".
17.4.3.1.2 Global names
1 Certain sets of names and function signatures are always reserved to
the implementation:
--- Each name that contains a double underscore (_ _) or begins with
an underscore followed by an upper- case letter (2.11) is reserved to
the implementation for any use.
--- Each name that begins with an underscore is reserved to the
implementation for use as a name in the global namespace. 165)
I guess the global namespace doesn't apply to macros, huh ;-)
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
