David Abrahams wrote:
> > // The following expands to
> > //
> > // typedef char (&sizeN_t)[N];
> > //
> > // for N = 1..BOOST_MAX_SIZETYPE_COUNT
> > #define SIZETYPE(z, n, nil) \
> > typedef char (&size ## n ## _t)[n]; \
> > /**/
>
> Careful; isn't the symbol "_t" reserved to the implementation
> in this context?
The purpose of the macros was to generate a couple of
typedef char (&sizeN_t)[N]; // for N=1..MAX
Statements, so _t is never seen by the compiler.
But anyway the solution proposed by Paul is cleaner, so I vote for it.
Regards Hartmut
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
