> Gennadiy Rozental wrote: > > > > It is not necessary. You program will be given *string* > > > "(0,1) (1,3)" and > > > can parse it using more powerfull means. I guess Spirit is > > > quite appropriate. > > > > I provide a way to parse it with very simple means. > > Spirit actually _is_ simple :-) > > Regards Hartmut
I don't argue that. (Unfortunately) I am not familiar with Spirit enough to judge. What I sad is that I *also* provide a means to implement such parsing logic pretty easy. What would be more convinient, easier, more appropriate in every concreate case depends on several factors. One of them is whether or not you familiar with Spirit. Gennadiy. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
