Gennadiy Rozental wrote: > > Why reinvent the wheel and not reuse existing code, which > is much more > > flexible (and _you_ are the one, who stresses flexibility) > and better > > fits into the task to solve. > > Even with my limited knowledge of Spirit, still I do not > believe I duplicate Spirit functionality in any way. What I > define are the skeletons for different parsing logics. One > could choose what parser (interpreter in my > terms) to use to do a real job.
<quote> my_program ( 0, 1) ( 1, 3) (( 0, 1), 15 ), (( 0,1), (7.8) ) This is input of 2 points circle and line. </quote> This isn't a simple parsing task anymore. Regards Hartmut _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
