At 09:53 PM 1/19/2003, Jeff Garland wrote:

>Nice! Any explanation why so many more tests on Win32 and BSD (300+) than
>on say Linux (~200)?

The date is important; since the subinclude feature became available recently people have been adding tests.

Thus the December linux tests reported 203 tests but the January 20 run reported 285.

Not sure why that is still 20-some less than Win32 and OpenBSD. Could some libraries may be suppressing tests that don't apply?

--Beman


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to