On Tuesday 21 January 2003 05:33 pm, Beman Dawes wrote: > At 08:05 PM 1/21/2003, Alkis Evlogimenos wrote: > >On Tuesday 21 January 2003 04:18 am, John Maddock wrote: > >> The linux status page is still all messed up: the library names are > > > >missing > > > >> as are test type from the table, would it be possible to modify your > >> scripts to use a variant of boost-path/tools/regression/run_tests.sh? > >> (Since we know that that one does the right thing on linux). > > > >I reran the tests again with updated bjam and regression utilities but > > the > > >table is not coming out right. Is it possible that process_jam_log is > >confused because I run the tests for all toolsets in one command > >(run_tests.sh runs the regression for one toolset at a time). > > The Windows tests always run all toolsets in one command. AFAIK that should > work OK on Linux too. > > In what way is the table not coming out right?
The library names for the first 50 or so tests is not there and the test type is reported as unknown. -- Alkis _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
