> By the same reasoning, is_convertible<void(), void(*)()> should evaluate to > true, since a function type is implicitly convertible to its pointer type. > But given the current implementation (1.29.0), > is_convertible<void(),void(*)()> doesn't compile. > > Opinions? Is this just too nit-picky?
You're probably right, I guess we should convert non-object types to references internally so that cases like this will actually compile. John Maddock http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
